A number of people correctly point out the circular nature of the arguments about raw milk and pathogens that keep coming up–most recently in my previous post.

It feels, sometimes, as if we get stuck in a netherworld where were not sure what is sick and what is healthy. A little like our nations current financial-economic upheaval.

Heres an effort to provide some perspectivefirst, on the more immediate situations of Hendricks Farm and Dairy and Organic Pastures Dairy Co.

–The day after Gary Cox of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund tells us in a comment on my previous post that that organization has taken on the Hendricks case, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture informs us it rescinded the fluid raw milk permit suspension for the Hendricks Farm & Dairy.

Hmmm, maybe the prospect of having to finally face a Pennsylvania raw milk producer represented by a skilled lawyer made the PDA think more clearly.

–What makes Mark McAfees comments about the childrens illnesses so inflammatory is his unwillingness to acknowledge how sick two of the children were, regardless of the cause. The fact that the children may not have been on life support at the time he visited the hospitals doesnt negate the reality that they were very sick, and I sense that a big part of the upset and frustration with Mark is his seeming tendency to suggest they werent as sick as they really were before he visited.

–Compounding Marks failures are the governments failures to accurately report what happened. As Mark points out, government officials have reported on the illnesses of the California children several different ways, including when the officials first informed him of what was supposedly happening. As just one public example of the contradictions, the U.S. Food and Drug Administrations John Sheehan, in his 2007 testimony before the Maryland House of Delegates I quoted from in my previous post, said this about the illnesses:

“An outbreak of foodborne illness involving E.coli 0157:H7 also occurred in California last year. This outbreak was determined by California to likely be caused by a dairy owned by a raw milk advocate…According to California authorities, all three victims in this outbreak were children and all three were hospitalized.”

In a report from the FDA’s cousin, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, it’s two children who were hospitalized.

So in one account, it’s three victims, all of whom were hospitalized, and in a second account, it’s six children who became ill, two of whom were hospitalized.

While Marks deficiencies are understandably difficult for many to accept, especially the parents of the children who became ill, the fact remains that if the government health authorities paid to protect us are so confused, its tough to expect a business owner whose livelihood is being threatened with shutdown to be totally objective and accepting of the confusion. Gwen/elderberryjam, in her comment on my previous post, states the case for Organic Pastures quite eloquently.

Big picture, I think Dave Milano says it best when he observes, Our health science controls the regulations, andit is based on a faulty premise, that bugs equal sickness. Until that premise is called into question, this fight will not go away.

These faulty premises lead to the creation of incredibly complex structures, thoughnamely, our current health care system and its obsessiveness with eliminating bugs

Similarly, our mounting national/international financial problems are based on a faulty premise–that debt is good, and more debt is better. We are now witnessing what happens when the structures collapse on themselves. Are we getting a taste of what is to come in health care?