JohnSheehan4-09.jpg

John Sheehan, head of the FDA's Plant and Dairy Division, in the photo taken in Florida in 2009, as described by Sheehan in an email to the head of the Dairy Research Institute. In October, I expressed the view that an academic article favorable to raw milk, and posted on a web site of the University of California, Davis, was removed at the orders of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s director of Plant and Dairy Food Safety, John Sheehan. 

Not so, says Sheehan. In an email exchange Sheehan had with the head of the Dairy Research Institute, Greg Miller, Sheehan sounds off on the article mystery…and on yours truly, since I was the only media person to raise questions about the infringement on academic freedom. 

The email exchange was obtained by Mark McAfee of Organic Pastures Dairy Co. via a Freedom of Information inquiry. If you’ll remember, the article, analyzing research out of Europe showing strong linkages between reduced asthma and allergies among children drinking raw milk, was taken down shortly after it was posted in the “Splash” newsletter by the UC Davis-based International Milk Genomics Consortium. The IMGC is supported  in part by  the California Dairy Research Foundation, which in turn is supported  in part by Miller’s Dairy Research Institute.

All indications, as I described in my post, pointed to Sheehan. But when Miller of the Dairy Research Institute forwarded Sheehan a link to my post two days after it went up, the FDA official responded, stiffly: “The fact of the matter is that I expressed my regret to you that the decision was made to take the article down, as  opposed to just correcting it. I still think it’s a pity that they didn’t just correct the article, as every reader of same would surely have benefited from getting the correct information as to the impact of minimum HTST (high-temperature short-time pasteurization) conditions on caseins and whey proteins.” 

The  article was re-posted a few weeks later, with a number of editorial notes and edits, which I detailed in a followup post

Sheehan had some choice comments about me as the author of  the original post pointing to FDA complicity in the removal of the academic article, suggesting I wrote the post because I have it in for the bureaucrat. In providing background to Miller about me, Sheehan actually started off pretty positive: “This guy has written  a few articles about me before. Seems like every so often he feels the need to do so.  One time he actually flew down  to Florida just  to  get my picture (see above)–or  so he says.  The resulting article that he wrote was just hysterical–really very funny.”

Gee, he almost made  it  seem like we  were buddies…except  for his omission to Miller that Sheehan in Florida refused to have even the briefest  of  conversations with me. (Here is that post.) 

And the  buddy-buddy thing goes bye-bye pretty quickly after that, as Sheehan continues on about my motives: “He has  even gone so  far as to publish  a very old version of my resume–I don’t  know why or to what end–and has generally done his best to  try to  cause me some harm, or so it would seem. This latest article is just more of  the same,  really.” 

Really? Sheehan portrays himself as  some unknowing victim of a vendetta by me,  when the reality is that he has cloaked himself  in nearly complete secrecy while waging a take-no-prisoners  war  on raw milk providers  and  consumers. For  instance,  that  resume situation he refers to…I obtained the document via a Freedom  of Information Act request after he  refused to authorize the FDA’s PR people to provide me with any substantive  details  about his background,  such  as  where he  worked  before he  came to the FDA–all  when I  was  researching my book, The Raw Milk Revolution. High-ranking bureaucrats routinely  hand out  such  information to the media,  yet Sheehan decided  to  be completely  uncooperative and secretive, and has pursued that approach in nearly every aspect of his job.It’s not just me–he refuses pretty much to speak with any media that he thinks might ask serious questions. He has opted out of interviews and speaking engagements when he thought raw milk proponents might be in the audience.                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
Anyway, I’m  not sure  he has pulled back  the cloak far enough for  us to decipher who  actually did  what  to whom in that  troubling episode  of stomping  on academic freedom. But clearly,  the  orders came from outside UC Davis, from on high in the dairy  industry and/or  the  government.